In January 2014, approximately 10,000 gallons of chemical compounds used to process coal spilled from a garage tank into the Elk River in West Virginia. The Elk River is a municipal water source which serves about 300,000 people within the Charleston area.The Elk River chemical spill occurred on January 9, 2014 whilst crude 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol (MCHM) was launched from a Freedom Industries facility into the Elk River, a tributary of the Kanawha River, in Charleston inside the U.S. country of West Virginia.
Figure 1 Location of river and chemical source industry.
Crude MCHM is a chemical foam used to clean coal and clear impurities that make pollution all through combustion. The "do-not-use" advisory for drinking water from West Virginia American Water's began to be regularly lifted with the aid of West Virginia kingdom officers on January 13 based upon "priority zones."
Figure 2 The MCHM which polluted the river.
On Tuesday, January 14, the industry found out that the tank, which leaked about 7,500 gallons into the floor with the aby of the Elk River, had additionally contained a mixture of glycol ethers referred to as PPH, with a similar characteristic as MCHM. The chemical spill became the 3rd chemical accident to occur inside the Kanawha River Valley within the latest 5 years. On June 12, 2014 another spill of containment water befell at the same site. The spill began on Thursday, January 9, 2014 when as much as 7,500 US gallons (28,000 litres; 6,2 hundred imperial gallons) of crude MCHM leaked from a one-inch hollow in the bottom of a chrome steel storage tank able to protecting 40,000 US gallons (150,000 litres; 33,000 imperial gallons) and its containment area at Freedom Industries' Charleston facility.The MCHM leaked from the containment location and into the ground, via which it traveled into the Elk River.The chemical spill passed off 1 mile (1.6 km) upstream from West Virginia American Water's uncooked water consumption at its Kanawha Valley Water Treatment Plant.The Elk River measured approximately 7 feet (2.1 m) extensive at the time of the spill.
Figure 3 This how leak the chemical from factory.
Residents had been advised not to drink, cook dinner with, bathe, or wash with West Virginia American Water river water; up to 300,000 citizens have been affected. The place affected spanned nine counties in the Charleston, West Virginia metropolitan place.he regions affected including Boone, Clay, Jackson, Kanawha, Lincoln, Logan, Putnam, and Roane counties and within the Culloden vicinity of CabellThe majority of Cabell County became unaffected as its public water system makes use of water from the Ohio River, and some citizens in Saint Albans in Kanawha County, Lincoln County and Hurricane in Putnam county have been not tormented by the water ban as they were served by nearby public water systems.
Figure 4 Nine countries that effected by Elk River chemical spill.
The spill was noticed round mid morning on January 9 by few Charleston location residents when they began to notice a "candy smell"(like Licorice) within the air.DEP started out receiving more notice from Charleston citizens at 8:15am.According to Freedom Industries, two personnel noticed leakage from the tank into the containment location around 10:30 a.m. On January 9.According to the company's president, Gary Southern, workers started cleanup immediately by hauling away the remaining MCHM within the storage tank and vacuuming the spilled MCHM from the floor nearby.
Figure 5 The Charleston location resident beside Elk River.
However, the DEP, whose inspectors discovered the leak at 11:10 a.M. In response to residents' complaints approximately the odor,contradicted Southern's claim. When the department's inspectors arrived on the facility, they determined the MCHM leaking through a concrete block containment dike and cleanup or containment measures underway.Inspectors located a 4-foot (1.2 m) extensive circulation of chemical liquid flowing across the ground of the containment dike and into the ground in which the dike's wall joined with its floor. According to DEP inspectors, they determined a pool of clean liquid measuring about 400 square feet (37 m2) in size outside of the broken white stainless steel tank, Number 396. DEP inspectors also stated that Freedom Industries' employees had set up one cinder block and a 50 pounds (23 kg) bag of protection absorbent powder to stop the flow of stream of leaking chemical.
Figure 6 Damaged white stainless steel tank, Number 396.
DEP air quality inspector Mike Kolb described the scene as "a Band-Aid approach" and said further hat it was "apparent that this was not an event that had just happened." The DEP and the Kanawha County Fire Department had been capable of locate the beginning of the leak by way of tracing the smell.At the time of the leak's discovery by the inspectors, the broken storage tank contained about 30,000 US gallons (110,000 litres; 25,000 imperial gallons) of MCHM.
Figure 7 The DEP and the Kanawha County Fire Department inspect the water.
West Virginia American Water become aware of the chemical spill at noon, but assumed that they may filter out it. By 4pm., while its carbon filtration machine could no longer deal with the massive quantity of contamination in the water and the chemical began flowing thru the carbon filter out, they decided to report the problem. This they did at 5:09 p.m. West Virginia American Water concluded that its tap water became unsafe for use and advised its customers to cease the use of its tap water at 5:45 p.m. Freedom Industries failed to touch West Virginia American Water following the spill, and West Virginia American Water became rather notified by DEP. Freedom Industries refused media inquiries following the spill.[The company's president, Gary Southern gave a ten-minute news conference the subsequent evening, January 10.
Figure 8 Freedom Industries not ready to answer the public and media about the failure.
The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources stated that 122 humans had sought remedy by means of January 11 for signs which include nausea and vomiting.Of the ones 122 humans, 4 people beings were admitted to the Charleston Area Medical Center and at another area hospital for remark with signs of nausea. On January 12, the range of patients handled at hospitals for their signs and symptoms from chemical publicity grew to approximately 169. By that night of January 10, almost 700 residents had contacted West Virginia's poison control center, reporting range of symptoms which includes nausea and rashes. On January 13, the overall range of citizens who have been hospitalized had risen to 10, and by means of January 14, the entire reached 14, despite the fact that none had been in serious condition.By 1 p.m. On January 10, the sweet-smelling was not detectable, in West Virginia National Guard Adjutant, Major General James Hoyer. On January eleven, the leader of DEP's Homeland Security and Emergency Response division, Mike Dorsey, stated that 7,500 US gallons (28,000 litres; 6,200 imperial gallons) of MCHM had spilled into the river, 2,500 US gallons (9,500 litres; 2,100 imperial gallons) more than had formerly been estimated.
Figure 9 People waiting to get their treatment from hospital.
The "do-not-use" advisory on drinking water from the West Virginia American Water process began to be lifted through West Virginia state officers on January 13, five days after it have been positioned into impact following the January nine detection of the chemical spill.The lifting of the ban began with hospital facilities and prolonged zone by zone within West Virginia American Water system.Following the gradual end to the "do-not-use" advisory, affected Charleston place residents had been instructed to flush water from their pipes, hot water tanks, and the icemakers of their refrigerators.West Virginia American Water started lifting the "do-not-use" ban in downtown Charleston, and would begin phasing in use of the device's drinking water based upon "priority zonesBy the evening of January 13, 15 percent of West Virginia American Water's clients were accredited to start using the consuming water.
Figure 10 Do not drink label applied everywhere.
On January 13, a Kanawha County Circuit Court judge issued a transient restraining order to maintain evidence on the Freedom Industries' Charleston facility. The order additionally prohibited the company from modifying in any manner "any structure, tank, equipment, materials or condition of" its facility, except as necessary and easy up the chemical spill.
Figure 11 Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia following the tap water ban.
As a result of West Virginia American Water's notice that the tap water was unsafe following the spill, Charleston area businesses closed and hospitals took emergency measures to conserve water. School systems within the affected eight counties were also closed Charleston area residents hurried to nearby stores to stock up on available bottled and packaged water. The West Virginia Legislature, which had reconvened following its winter break, cancelled its business on January 9. On January 9, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia in Charleston and the courts in Boone and Lincoln counties closed. West Virginia State University in Institute also cancelled its classes for the duration of the tap water outage.Because of the lack of potable water, Charleston cancelled a convention of mayors and city council members from around the state of West Virginia, which had been scheduled to begin on January 13.
Figure 12 cleaning and Testing Process
On January 21, Freedom Industries notified West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection that a second chemical, polyglycol ethers (PPH), was in the leaking tank with the MCHM. The department said that the failure to report accurately the type of materials and the quantities is a violation of state law.A one-year incident timeline can be found published in the Supporting Information section of a 2014 research paper.A case study of the incident can be found published here.This report only includes information that was publicly available as of March 2016. This report does not include the findings and information released by the US Chemical Hazard and Safety Board, US National Toxicology Program, and other academic studies. Information disclosed as part of these studies indicated more than 100 mg/L of 4-MCHM was present in the Elk River, levels greater than 3.773 ppm 4-MCHM were present in the water treatment plant, among other information.
The president of West Virginia American Water stated that his company was not aware of a treatment to remove the chemical from its system.Because of this, West Virginia American Water began flushing miles of lines within its Charleston area water system, although as of January 11, there was no timetable as to when its system would be safe for area residents to use.West Virginia American Water's engineers began adding additional carbon and other chemicals to speed the treatment process and move the contaminated water out of its water distribution system.Michael Dorsey, Chief of the DEP's Homeland Security and Emergency Response division stated that tests conducted on water samples taken on the night of January 9–10 showed the concentration of MCHM had decreased from 2 parts per million to 1.7 parts per million.That finding remained above the 1 part per million recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as "acceptable."The West Virginia National Guard continued to test the water every hour and its teams worked overnight between January 9 and 10 to perform tests and report results on both inflow and outflow samples of the Elk River's water.Each test took approximately 46 minutes. Tests conducted over the weekend of January 11–12 at four locations indicated a safe amount below 1 part per million of the chemical.Despite this, officials continued testing throughout the water system's distribution area into January 13 before ending the system-wide "no use" advisory.
The chemical's manufacturer, Eastman Chemical Company, maintains that when MCHM is diluted, the compound does not have adverse effects on the aquatic environment. No fish kills were reported following the spill and there was no apparent effect on aquatic life, according to West Virginia state officials.As of 2008, the Elk River serves as the sole remaining habitat for the diamond darter (Crystallaria cincotta). On July 26, 2013, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service formally designated the diamond darter as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.The potential risk of the chemical spill to the diamond darter has not been reported
Figure 13 Former president of Freedom Industry Gary Southern.
The former president of the company that owned the tank, Freedom Industries, faces federal charges of fraud and lying under oath in connection with the incident. Freedom Industries went bankrupt shortly after the spill, and the tanks were dismantled. Since the spill, the local water utility has installed new treatment and chemical monitoring equipment.
Based on my opinion as prevention The Elk River chemical spill response and recovery also underscored the need for rapid and standard tests that can identify breakdown and transformation products as contaminated water passes through water treatment plants. Also needed are methods to predict if contaminants are preferentially sequestered as water passes through water treatment processes (i.e., oxidation, activated carbon) and infrastructure (i.e., pipe/coatings).
The incident revealed that the actions needed to safely decontaminate premise plumbing are poorly understood. A stepwise decontamination process has been described elsewhere1 but additional work is needed to address knowledge-gaps. It is recommended that flushing and other infrastructure decontamination protocols be thoroughly tested and air monitoring should be conducted in conjunction with water sampling before the public is told to flush their premise plumbing. If responders do not fully understand the contaminants present in the contaminated water, health officials cannot issue guidance to best protect the population from harm. If chemical testing is not thoroughly conducted during the early stages of the incident, this lack of data will affect all downstream public health decisions possibly extending the recovery period, resulting in lost public confidence, spread of contamination, and causing the population to experience adverse health impacts.

































